Scope & Jurisdiction
Climate Target
Energy Deployment
Land & Natural Capital
Policy Design
Technology Portfolio
Gap Accounting
Uncertainty
Physical Climate Risk
Adaptation
11 Economic Cost
12 Fiscal Risk
13 Finance & Investment
14 Just Transition
Test

Step 7 — Emissions Gap Accounting

Combine policy abatement (Step 5) with technology portfolio (Step 6) against the global baseline to compute sector-level gaps, residual breakthrough requirements, and pathway coverage versus IPCC carbon budgets.

From Steps 5–6: Policy abatement: Gt/yr Carbon price 2025: $/t Tech mean: Gt δ:
57.4
Baseline Emissions (Gt)
Total Abatement (Gt)
Gap B₂₀₅₀ (Gt)
E[Gap] Gt
Coverage %
IPCC Scenario

Emissions Pathway (Gt CO₂e/yr)

Abatement Waterfall — 2050

Residual Gap by Sector

IPCC Scenario Band Mapping

ScenarioTemp TargetBudget (Gt)Your CoverageStatus
Infrastructure Delay Cost

Budget Foregone by Delayed Investment (Gt CO₂e)

CO₂ Systems Coupling Chain

Cross-Sector Interaction Pathways

Energy
Industry
Transport
Buildings
Land Use
Agri
Hydrogen coupling: energy ↔ industry ↔ transport (12–18% overlap in avoided emissions if green H₂ achieves scale) · Electrification coupling: energy grid → EVs + heat pumps (15–20% co-benefit) · NbS coupling: land use ↔ agriculture ↔ CDR (soil carbon + reforestation double-count risk: apply δ = 0.22)
State Capacity Assessment

Policy Delivery Readiness by Sector

Capacity ratings from World Bank GovTech, NDC implementation tracker, and IEA clean energy policy data.
Feeds into Step 8 (Uncertainty): breakthrough_gap_gt, coverage_pct, and sector_gaps define Monte Carlo distribution bounds · Step 11 (Economic Cost): carbon_price_needed and total_abatement_gt drive the MAC curve · Step 13 (Finance): gap_gt informs total investment mobilization requirement
Back