☀️ Earth's Energy Balance 1,361 W/m² incoming solar radiation +0.9 W/m² current energy imbalance

Earth's climate is governed by an energy budget: the planet must radiate as much energy as it absorbs. Human GHG emissions have created a persistent energy surplus — driving warming until a new balance is reached Sources: NASA CERES; IPCC AR6 WG1; Trenberth, Fasullo & Kiehl 2009; Loeb et al. 2021; Hansen et al. 2023; NOAA GCOS; Wild et al. 2013
1,361 W/m²
Total Solar Irradiance (TSI)
The solar constant — average solar power hitting the top of Earth's atmosphere; varies ±0.1% over the 11-year sunspot cycle
340 W/m²
Average absorbed solar radiation
TSI ÷ 4 (Earth's spherical geometry) × (1 − albedo 0.30) = 238 W/m² absorbed; 100 W/m² reflected back
238 W/m²
Outgoing longwave radiation (OLR)
Energy emitted to space as infrared; must equal absorbed solar for equilibrium. Currently ~0.9 W/m² less than absorbed
+0.9 W/m²
Earth's Energy Imbalance (EEI)
Measured by CERES satellites & Argo floats; ~93% of this excess heat is absorbed by oceans. This is the fundamental driver of ongoing warming
~33°C
Natural greenhouse effect
Without any greenhouse gases, Earth's surface would be −18°C (0°F). GHGs raise the average to +15°C — a 33°C warming that makes life possible
0.30
Planetary albedo (Bond albedo)
30% of incoming solar is reflected — mostly by clouds (22%), then ice/snow (5%), then land surfaces (3%). Albedo changes are a major climate feedback
2.5°C/W/m²
Equilibrium Climate Sensitivity proxy
Best estimate: 3°C warming per doubling of CO₂ (~3.7 W/m² forcing); range 2.5–4°C. Every 1 W/m² sustained imbalance eventually yields ~0.5–0.8°C
15 W/m²
Increase in downwelling IR since 1750
Satellite & surface spectroscopy confirm this enhanced greenhouse forcing from CO₂, CH₄, N₂O, and other anthropogenic GHGs

The Global Energy Budget — All Flows

Source: Trenberth, Fasullo & Kiehl 2009 (BAMS); Wild et al. 2013 (revised global energy budget); Stephens et al. 2012 (observationally constrained energy budget); IPCC AR6 WG1 Chapter 7 Table 7.SM.1.

How Earth's Energy Budget Works

The Sun delivers ~1,361 W/m² at the top of the atmosphere. Because Earth is a sphere, the cross-sectional area that intercepts sunlight is ¼ of the total surface area, so the average over the whole globe is ~340 W/m². Of this:

Reflected by clouds~77 W/m²
Reflected by atmosphere (aerosols, gases)~23 W/m²
Reflected by surface (ice, land, ocean)~23 W/m²
Absorbed by atmosphere~79 W/m²
Absorbed by surface~161 W/m²
Total absorbed by Earth system~240 W/m²

The surface then emits this energy as longwave (infrared) radiation. The atmosphere absorbs most of this upwelling IR and re-emits it — sending some back to the surface (the greenhouse effect: ~345 W/m² back-radiation) and some to space. In equilibrium, outgoing longwave radiation (OLR) to space = incoming absorbed solar. Currently, OLR ≈ 239 W/m² while absorption ≈ 240 W/m² — a surplus of ~0.9–1.0 W/m² that is accumulating as heat.

Source: Trenberth et al. 2009; Stephens et al. 2012; Wild et al. 2015; Loeb et al. 2021 (CERES EBAF); IPCC AR6 WG1 FAQ 7.1.
Why does +0.9 W/m² matter so much? Earth's total surface area is 510 trillion m². A sustained imbalance of 0.9 W/m² means ~459 terawatts of continuous excess energy accumulation — equivalent to detonating ~4 Hiroshima atomic bombs per second, every second, over the entire planet. ~93% of this energy goes into the oceans (measured by Argo floats), ~3% melts ice, ~3% warms the land surface and atmosphere. The 0.9 W/m² imbalance is small compared to the ~240 W/m² budget, but its effects compound relentlessly over decades.

Total Solar Irradiance — 1600 to Present

Source: Lean et al. 2005 (reconstructed TSI); ACRIM / VIRGO / TIM satellite composites; Kopp & Lean 2011 (TSI = 1360.8 W/m²); Matthes et al. 2017 (CMIP6 solar forcing); Wang, Lean & Sheeley 2005 (Maunder Minimum reconstruction).

Anatomy of Incoming Solar Radiation

The solar constant and its variation

TSI averages ~1,361 W/m² but varies by ~1–2 W/m² over the 11-year sunspot cycle (solar maximum = more sunspots = slightly higher TSI). The Maunder Minimum (1645–1715), when sunspots almost vanished, is estimated to have caused TSI ~3–5 W/m² below modern values — contributing to the "Little Ice Age" cooling, though volcanic and ocean circulation factors also played major roles.

Distribution by wavelength

The Sun emits electromagnetic radiation peaking in the visible spectrum (~500 nm). About 44% of TSI is visible light, 49% is near-infrared, and 7% is ultraviolet. UV is absorbed by stratospheric ozone (warming the stratosphere). Near-IR is partially absorbed by water vapour and CO₂ in the atmosphere; visible light mostly reaches the surface.

Absorbed solar radiation (ASR)

The fraction absorbed by Earth = (1 − albedo) × TSI/4 = (1 − 0.30) × 340.25 ≈ 238 W/m². This is the energy the planet must radiate back to space in equilibrium. Changes in albedo have an equal and opposite effect to changes in TSI — which is why cloud feedback and ice-albedo feedback are so important.

Source: Kopp & Lean 2011; Wild et al. 2013; Lean & Rind 2008; IPCC AR6 WG1 Ch.2 (solar forcing historical); Steinhilber et al. 2009.

Solar Spectrum — Incoming vs. Absorbed vs. Reflected

Source: ASTM E490 solar spectrum standard; Lean 2010 (solar spectral irradiance); Rottman 2006 (SORCE/SIM instrument); atmospheric transmission data from MODTRAN; Trenberth et al. 2009.
Is recent warming from the Sun? No. Satellite measurements since 1978 show that TSI has been flat or very slightly declining over the period of the most rapid warming (1980–present). Solar forcing contributes roughly +0.05 to +0.1 W/m² since 1750 — less than 5% of the ~2.7 W/m² total anthropogenic forcing measured by IPCC AR6. The 11-year solar cycle causes natural variability of ~±0.1°C in global surface temperature, but there is no long-term solar trend that can explain the observed ~1.2°C of post-industrial warming.

Outgoing Longwave Radiation vs. Absorbed Solar (1985–2023)

Source: NASA CERES EBAF Ed4.2 (2001–present); ERBE satellite data (1985–1999); Loeb et al. 2018; Loeb et al. 2021 (Nature Climate Change — Earth's energy imbalance); NOAA HIRS-derived OLR.

How Earth Loses Energy to Space

Outgoing Longwave Radiation (OLR)

Earth's surface (average ~288 K) emits infrared radiation according to the Stefan-Boltzmann law. But the atmosphere is largely opaque to these wavelengths — only the "atmospheric window" (8–13 µm) allows surface radiation to escape directly. Greenhouse gases absorb the rest. The effective emission level for most IR is ~5–10 km altitude, where the temperature is ~220 K (−53°C), producing OLR of ~239 W/m².

Reflected Solar Radiation (RSR)

~100 W/m² of incoming solar is reflected directly to space before being absorbed. Clouds are the dominant reflector (albedo ~0.5–0.7 for thick clouds). High clouds (cirrus) are semi-transparent to solar but opaque to outgoing IR — a net warming effect. Low clouds (stratus, cumulus) reflect strongly — a net cooling effect. Changes in cloud cover, altitude, and optical thickness are the largest source of uncertainty in climate projections.

The emission temperature puzzle

If Earth had no atmosphere, it would need to emit from the surface at ~255 K (−18°C) to balance 240 W/m² of absorbed solar. The actual surface temperature is ~288 K (+15°C). The 33°C difference is the natural greenhouse effect, maintained by the back-radiation from atmospheric GHGs. Adding more GHGs raises the effective emission altitude (colder atmosphere → less OLR → energy imbalance → warming until a new equilibrium is reached).

Source: Pierrehumbert 2010 (Principles of Planetary Climate); Trenberth et al. 2009; Kiehl & Trenberth 1997 (Earth's annual global mean energy budget); Loeb et al. 2021.
The "missing" window — why CO₂ forces the climate: The atmosphere is transparent to certain IR wavelengths ("atmospheric windows") but CO₂ absorbs strongly around 15 µm and the wings of that band are not yet saturated. Adding more CO₂ closes parts of the window, reducing OLR without changing absorbed solar — creating a sustained energy surplus. Satellite measurements directly observe the narrowing of Earth's emission spectrum at CO₂ absorption wavelengths over time, providing definitive fingerprint evidence of anthropogenic forcing.

Greenhouse Gas Radiative Forcing (1750 → 2023)

Source: IPCC AR6 WG1 Chapter 7 Table 7.SM.2 (ERF); Forster et al. 2021 (indicators of Global Climate Change); NOAA AGGI 2023; Myhre et al. 2013 (AR5 forcing estimates); Etminan et al. 2016 (revised CH₄ and N₂O formulas).

How the Greenhouse Effect Works

Molecular absorption — the key physics

Greenhouse gases are transparent to shortwave solar radiation (visible + near-IR) but absorb outgoing longwave (mid-IR) radiation emitted by the warm surface. This absorption excites vibrational and rotational modes of asymmetric molecules (CO₂, H₂O, CH₄, N₂O, O₃). The excited molecule then re-emits in all directions — sending roughly half the energy back toward the surface (downwelling longwave radiation, ~345 W/m²), warming it above the temperature it would reach by solar absorption alone.

The key greenhouse gases and their roles

Water vapour (H₂O)~50% of natural greenhouse effect
Carbon dioxide (CO₂)~20% natural + primary anthropogenic driver
Clouds (liquid/ice)~25% natural greenhouse (also reflects)
Ozone (O₃)~8% natural; also absorbs UV
Methane (CH₄)0.5 W/m² anthropogenic ERF
Nitrous oxide (N₂O)0.21 W/m² anthropogenic ERF
Halogenated gases (HFCs, etc.)0.41 W/m² total ERF
Total anthropogenic ERF (2023)~2.9 W/m²
Source: IPCC AR6 Table 7.SM.2; Myhre et al. 2013; Etminan et al. 2016; Forster et al. 2021; NOAA GML global greenhouse gas data.
Why CO₂ is "the control knob" despite being a minor GHG: Water vapour is the largest greenhouse gas by concentration (~1–4% of atmosphere) but its atmospheric abundance is determined by temperature — it is a feedback, not a forcing. CO₂ is the primary non-condensing GHG that sets the baseline temperature, which then controls how much water vapour the atmosphere holds. Paleoclimate evidence across 800,000 years of ice cores shows that CO₂ and temperature have co-varied tightly, with CO₂ acting as an amplifier and eventual driver on millennial timescales. Today's atmospheric CO₂ (424 ppm) is higher than at any point in at least 3–5 million years.

Earth's Energy Imbalance — Ocean Heat Content Trend

Source: Loeb et al. 2021 (Nature Climate Change — EEI 2005–2019); von Schuckmann et al. 2020 (GCOS ocean heat content); Cheng et al. 2022 (2022 ocean warmest on record); Johnson et al. 2018 (Argo); Hansen et al. 2023 (0–2000 m OHC and EEI); IPCC AR6 WG1 Box 7.2.

Where the Excess Energy Goes

The oceans — Earth's heat buffer

Approximately 93% of the excess energy accumulating from the EEI goes into the ocean, primarily the upper 2,000 m measured by the Argo float network. Ocean heat content (OHC) has risen unambiguously since the 1970s and has been accelerating since the 2000s. This stored heat will continue to drive sea level rise (thermal expansion) and influence atmospheric circulation for centuries even if GHG concentrations stabilised today.

Ice melt — committed sea level rise

About 3% of the EEI goes into melting land ice (Greenland, Antarctica, mountain glaciers) and sea ice. The distinction matters: melting sea ice does not raise sea level (like ice in a glass of water), but melting land ice does. Current EEI alone commits ~0.3 mm/yr of sea level rise from ice melt, plus ~1.5 mm/yr from thermal expansion — totalling ~2+ mm/yr even at today's CO₂ levels.

Ocean (0–2000 m) heat uptake~0.82 W/m² (93%)
Land surface warming~0.03 W/m² (3%)
Ice melt (Greenland + Antarctica)~0.03 W/m² (3%)
Atmosphere warming~0.01 W/m² (1%)
Total EEI (~2020)~0.87–1.0 W/m²
Source: Loeb et al. 2021; von Schuckmann et al. 2020; Hansen et al. 2023; IPCC AR6 WG1 Ch. 7 Box 7.2; WCRP Global Sea Level Budget Group 2018.
The EEI has doubled in the last 15 years: The most recent analysis (Loeb et al. 2021, Nature Climate Change; Hansen et al. 2023) finds that Earth's Energy Imbalance approximately doubled from ~0.4–0.5 W/m² in 2005–2012 to ~0.87–1.0 W/m² in 2016–2022. Part of this doubling may reflect increased forcing from rising GHGs, but a significant portion appears related to reduced aerosol cooling (cleaner air in Asia) and possible cloud feedbacks. If confirmed, this acceleration implies faster warming to come even without additional GHG increases.

Climate Feedback Strengths (W/m²/°C)

Source: IPCC AR6 WG1 Table 7.10 (assessed feedback parameters); Sherwood et al. 2020 (ECS reassessment); Zelinka et al. 2020 (cloud feedbacks CMIP6); Pithan & Mauritsen 2014 (Arctic amplification); Gregory et al. 2020 (Planck response).

Understanding Climate Feedbacks

A feedback is a process where an initial warming (or cooling) changes a physical quantity that, in turn, amplifies or dampens the original change. The sum of all feedbacks, plus the initial forcing, determines the equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS) — how much global mean temperature rises per doubling of CO₂.

Planck feedback (stabilising)

As Earth warms, it emits more longwave radiation (Stefan-Boltzmann: power ∝ T⁴). This is the primary restoring force that prevents runaway warming and gives ECS its finite value. Without it, any positive forcing would cause indefinite warming. The Planck feedback parameter is ~−3.3 W/m²/°C.

Water vapour feedback (amplifying — strongest positive)

Warming increases evaporation → more water vapour in the atmosphere → stronger greenhouse effect → more warming. This is the single largest positive feedback, roughly doubling the warming from CO₂ alone. The lapse rate feedback (how temperature changes with altitude) partially offsets water vapour, so they are usually quoted together: combined water vapour + lapse rate = +1.0 to +1.3 W/m²/°C.

Ice-albedo feedback (amplifying)

Warming melts snow and ice → darker ocean/land exposed → less solar reflection → more absorption → more warming. This feedback is particularly strong at the poles, driving "Arctic amplification" where the Arctic warms 2–4× faster than the global average.

Cloud feedbacks (uncertain — net slightly positive)

Clouds both cool (reflect solar) and warm (trap outgoing IR). How clouds change with warming is the single largest uncertainty in climate models. IPCC AR6 assesses net cloud feedback as positive (+0.42 W/m²/°C), primarily because high-altitude clouds rise as climate warms (keeping their temperature roughly constant, so they emit as much IR even at higher altitudes) and low marine clouds decrease slightly in coverage.

Source: IPCC AR6 WG1 Ch. 7; Sherwood et al. 2020; Zelinka et al. 2020; Pithan & Mauritsen 2014.
Why ECS is 3°C, not 1°C — the role of feedbacks: Without any feedbacks, doubling CO₂ would warm Earth by ~1.2°C (just from the Planck response). But water vapour, ice-albedo, and cloud feedbacks together add another ~1.8°C, yielding the best-estimate ECS of ~3°C. This 3°C figure has remained robust through the IPCC assessment reports from AR1 (1990) through AR6 (2021), now with a much narrower uncertainty range (2.5–4°C). The AR6 assessed ECS range excludes values below 2.5°C for the first time, reflecting stronger constraints from paleoclimate evidence, observed warming, and model improvements.